Bangladesh Charges Former PM Sheikh Hasina with Crimes Against Humanity

On June 1, 2025, Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) formally charged former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and two senior officials with crimes against humanity related to the violent crackdown on the 2024 student-led uprising. The charges allege that Hasina directly ordered a coordinated and systematic assault involving state security forces, ruling party affiliates, and allied groups, resulting in approximately 1,400 to 1,500 deaths and over 25,000 injuries. This unprecedented trial marks a significant moment in Bangladesh’s pursuit of accountability for mass violence and signals a shift in the country’s political landscape amid ongoing reforms and electoral preparations.

Background and Human Rights Issues

The 2024 uprising began as a student-led protest against public sector job quotas but quickly escalated into a nationwide movement demanding Hasina’s resignation amid allegations of corruption and authoritarian governance. The government’s response was marked by brutal crackdowns, including mass arrests, shootings, and widespread use of force against demonstrators. According to United Nations estimates and tribunal findings, the crackdown resulted in the deaths of up to 1,500 people and injuries to tens of thousands, making it one of the deadliest episodes in Bangladesh since its 1971 independence war.

The ICT investigation uncovered evidence that the killings were not spontaneous but planned and coordinated at the highest levels of government. Prosecutors presented video footage, encrypted communications, phone call recordings, and flight logs of helicopters and drones used during operations. The tribunal has listed 81 witnesses, including victims and officials, to testify on the events and chain of command.

Sheikh Hasina, who ruled Bangladesh for 15 years before resigning in August 2024 under pressure from mass protests, fled to New Delhi, India, where she remains in self-imposed exile, refusing to return despite extradition requests. Alongside crimes against humanity charges, Hasina and some family members face separate corruption allegations.

Key Facts and Legal Context

• Charges Filed:
  Five counts including abetment, incitement, complicity, facilitation, conspiracy, and failure to prevent mass murder during the July-August 2024 uprising.
• Casualties:
  Approximately 1,400 to 1,500 killed, 25,000 injured during government crackdowns.
• Evidence Presented:
  Video footage, encrypted communications, phone conversations, helicopter and drone flight logs, and witness testimonies.
• Defendants:
  Sheikh Hasina (former PM), former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun (in custody), former interior minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal (in hiding).
• Trial Proceedings:
  Began June 1, 2025, with live televised hearings—a first in Bangladesh’s history.
• Political Context:
  The ICT was originally established in 2009 to prosecute war crimes from the 1971 independence war but has since expanded its mandate. The current trial represents a historic precedent in holding a former head of government accountable for mass violence.

Political and Social Implications

The trial occurs amid a volatile political environment. Following Hasina’s ouster, the interim government has vowed to hold elections by June 2026 and faces pressure to demonstrate accountability for the 2024 crackdown. The prosecution of Hasina and senior officials is a key demand from opposition parties and civil society groups seeking justice and political reform.

Simultaneously, Bangladesh’s Supreme Court has ordered the restoration of the Jamaat-e-Islami party’s registration, allowing the right-wing Islamist party to participate in upcoming elections after a decade-long ban. Jamaat was among the groups supporting the 2024 student protests, and its reinstatement signals a potential reshaping of Bangladesh’s political landscape, increasing electoral competition and possibly influencing future governance.

The trial and political developments have drawn international attention, with human rights organizations emphasizing the importance of fair judicial processes and respect for due process. Critics warn of potential politicization of the ICT, which has previously been accused of targeting political opponents under Hasina’s administration.

Policy Options and Recommendations

Given the gravity and complexity of the situation, the following policy options are recommended for Bangladesh’s interim government, regional actors, and the international community:

• Ensure Fair and Transparent Judicial Process:
  The ICT must uphold international standards of due process, transparency, and impartiality to maintain legitimacy and avoid perceptions of political vendetta.
• Strengthen Protection of Civil Liberties:
  Authorities should guarantee freedom of expression, assembly, and political participation to foster a democratic environment conducive to peaceful political competition.
• Promote Inclusive Political Dialogue:
  Engage all political parties, including reinstated groups like Jamaat-e-Islami, in dialogue to reduce polarization and build consensus on electoral and governance reforms.
• Support Victims and Transitional Justice:
  Implement measures to provide reparations, psychosocial support, and community reconciliation programs for victims and families affected by the 2024 crackdown.
• Enhance International Monitoring:
  Invite regional and international observers to monitor trial proceedings and upcoming elections to bolster confidence in Bangladesh’s commitment to justice and democracy.

The charging of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina with crimes against humanity marks a watershed moment in Bangladesh’s pursuit of justice for mass violence. The trial reflects the country’s ongoing struggle to reconcile a history of political repression with aspirations for democratic accountability. While the judicial process offers an opportunity to address impunity, it also poses challenges related to political stability, rule of law, and human rights protections.

For decision-makers, journalists, and researchers, the unfolding trial and accompanying political shifts warrant close attention as Bangladesh navigates a critical juncture in its democratic transition. The Washington Centre for Human Rights will continue to monitor developments and advocate for justice, transparency, and respect for fundamental rights in Bangladesh and beyond.